A Computer Game for Abstract Argumentation
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper reports our work concerning the development of a computer game for abstract argumentation. In particular, we discuss the dialogue protocol we have used to regulate players in making moves. We also discuss proposed strategies for a software agent to act as a game player. The computer game has been fully implemented, and enables human versus human, agent versus agent and human versus agent playing of the game. A user based evaluation has been undertaken, and suggests that the game is both challenging and entertaining and is easy to learn. It is anticipated that this work will contribute to the development of argumentative agents and of computer game based educational argument, and help to illuminate research issues in the field of argumentation systems.
منابع مشابه
Lakatos-style collaborative mathematics through dialectical, structured and abstract argumentation
The simulation of mathematical reasoning has been a driving force throughout the history of Artificial Intelligence research. However, despite significant successes in computer mathematics, computers are not widely used by mathematicians apart from their quotidian applications. An oft-cited reason for this is that current computational systems cannot do mathematics in the way that humans do. We...
متن کاملMechanism design for abstract argumentation
Since their introduction by Dung over a decade ago, abstract argumentation frameworks have received increasing interest in artificial intelligence as a convenient model for reasoning about general characteristics of argument. Such a framework consists of a set of arguments and a binary defeat relation among them. Various semantic and computational approaches have been developed to characterise ...
متن کاملClassification and strategical issues of argumentation games on structured argumentation frameworks
This paper aims at giving a classification of argumentation games agents play within a multi-agent setting. We investigate different scenarios of such argumentation games that differ in the protocol used for argumentation, i. e. direct, synchronous, and dialectical argumentation protocols, the awareness that agents have on other agents beliefs, and different settings for the preferences of agen...
متن کاملOn Strategic Argument Selection in Structured Argumentation Systems
This paper deals with strategical issues of arguing agents in a multi-agent setting. We investigate different scenarios of such argumentation games that differ in the protocol used for argumentation, i. e. direct, synchronous, and dialectical argumentation protocols, the awareness that agents have on other agents beliefs, and different settings for the preferences of agents. We give a thorough ...
متن کاملArgument - based Approaches to Discussion , Inference and Uncertainty
Formal argumentation has become a popular approach for nonmonotonic reasoning and multi-agent communication in Artificial Intelligence and Computer Science. The approach of Dung on the semantics of abstract argumentation frameworks, which specifies different criteria for selecting arguments given an argumentation framework, received a lot of followup. This work aims to enhance today’s generatio...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2006